Mazda BT-50 2006 vs Chevrolet Colorado 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda BT-50 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Colorado has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda BT-50 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Colorado can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Colorado also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 | 2.8 - 5.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 177 - 305 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 250 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.5 - 12.7 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mazda BT-50 is 20 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Colorado, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 645 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`030 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Chevrolet Colorado has
| |