Mazda 5 2006 vs Ford Galaxy 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Mazda 5 engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 5 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 5 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 5 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mazda 5 is smaller. Mazda 5 is 14 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1566 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mazda 5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 5, so Mazda 5 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |