Mazda 5 2006 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 5 engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Grand Scenic, but torque is 10 NM more than Renault Grand Scenic. Due to the lower power, Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 5 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 5 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Mazda 5 is 1 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 513 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | 513 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1566 litres | 2015 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage space (by 401 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 449 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |