Mazda 5 2008 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda 5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 5 engine produces 38 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Volkswagen Caddy. Thanks to more power Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 5 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 5 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 5 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 154 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Caddy can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Caddy version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.83 m | |
| Mazda 5 is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1566 litres | 2239 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 673 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 5 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Caddy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |