Mazda 5 2008 vs Mazda 5 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 5 2010 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 5 2008 engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 5 2010, but torque is 40 NM more than Mazda 5 2010. Due to the lower power, Mazda 5 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 5 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 5 2008 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 5 2008 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 5 2008 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 5 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 5 2008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 5 2008 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 5 2010 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda 5 2010 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
| Mazda 5 2008 is 8 cm shorter than the Mazda 5 2010, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 5 2008 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1678 litres | 1485 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 5 2008 (by 193 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`245 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |