Mazda 5 2008 vs Ford S-Max 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 146 HP | 145 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Ford S-Max is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 5 engine produces 1 HP more power than Ford S-Max, but torque is 5 NM less than Ford S-Max. Despite the higher power, Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
The Ford S-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 5 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 5 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 5 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
580 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
Mazda 5 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 5 is 27 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 854 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | 854 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1566 litres | 2100 litres | |
In 7-seat version Ford S-Max has more luggage space (by 742 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 534 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 1 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 2`340 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Ford S-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 5 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2600 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |