Mazda 5 2008 vs Honda CR-V 2007

 
Mazda 5
2008 - 2010
Honda CR-V
2007 - 2010
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 146 HP150 HP
Torque: 185 NM192 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds10.2 seconds
Mazda 5 engine produces 4 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Honda CR-V.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.98.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.7 l/100km9.0 l/100km
By specification Mazda 5 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mazda 5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 5 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway860 km on highway
680 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption
Mazda 5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 430'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 7 years18 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 6Used also on Honda Accord
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.52 m
Width: 1.76 m1.82 m
Height: 1.67 m1.68 m
Mazda 5 is smaller.
Mazda 5 is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 2 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 115 litres556 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 115 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data556 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1566 litres955 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 5 (by 611 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1252`050
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

high
Honda CR-V has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 5 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 34005600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 5 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
  • lower price
Honda CR-V has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • hydraulic power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv