Mazda 5 2010 vs Mazda 5 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 144 HP | 146 HP | |
Torque: | 180 NM | 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
Mazda 5 2008 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 5 2010 engine produces 2 HP less power than Mazda 5 2008, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Mazda 5 2008. Due to the lower power, Mazda 5 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
600 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 5 2008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 5 2008 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 430'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 5 2010 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Mazda 5 2010 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.67 m | |
Mazda 5 2010 is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 5 2008, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 5 2010 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 112 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | 112 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1485 litres | 1566 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 5 2008 (by 81 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`125 | 2`150 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Average price (€): | 5200 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |