Mazda 5 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 5 engine produces 45 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mazda 5 is smaller. Mazda 5 is 23 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1597 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mazda 5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 5, so Mazda 5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |