Mazda 5 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
| Mazda 5 and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mazda 5 is smaller. Mazda 5 is 23 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1485 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`125 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mazda 5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 5, so Mazda 5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
| |