Mazda 5 2010 vs Toyota Verso 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 5 engine produces 11 HP less power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Toyota Verso. Due to the lower power, Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 5 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that by driving the Mazda 5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 5 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Auris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2009 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota Verso 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.62 m | |
| Mazda 5 is 15 cm longer than the Toyota Verso, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 484 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1485 litres | 1696 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Toyota Verso has more luggage space (by 66 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Verso (by 211 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`125 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 5 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |