Mazda 5 2010 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Mazda 5 engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Grand Scenic, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Renault Grand Scenic. Despite the higher power, Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.1 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 5 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 5 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda 5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Grand Scenic 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| Mazda 5 is 1 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1485 litres | 2063 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage space (by 533 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 578 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`125 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |