Mazda 5 2010 vs Opel Combo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Opel Combo is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 5 engine produces 10 HP more power than Opel Combo, but torque is 20 NM less than Opel Combo. Despite the higher power, Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Used also on Fiat Bravo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.85 m | |
| Mazda 5 is 20 cm longer than the Opel Combo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 790 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 790 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1485 litres | 3200 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Combo (by 1715 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Combo, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`125 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Opel Combo has
| |