Mazda 5 2010 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Mazda 5 engine produces 3 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mazda 5 is 12 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1485 litres | 1734 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C4 Picasso (by 249 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`125 kg | 2`050 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`415 kg | 1`489 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 710 kg | 561 kg | |
| Mazda 5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Therefore, Mazda 5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mazda 5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 5, so Mazda 5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |