Mazda 5 2010 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Mazda 5 engine produces 3 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 5 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 5 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 5 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mazda 5 is 15 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1485 litres | 1710 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C4 Picasso (by 225 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`125 kg | 1`940 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`415 kg | 1`298 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 710 kg | 642 kg | |
| Mazda 5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Therefore, Mazda 5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Mazda 5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 5, so Mazda 5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |