Mazda 5 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 115 - 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 270 NM | 185 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 13.7 seconds | 8.8 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.3 | 5.7 - 8.2 | |
|
Mazda 5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Mazda 5 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mazda 5 is smaller. Mazda 5 is 23 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1597 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Mazda 5 has 278 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`115 | ~ 2`486 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |