Mazda 5 2010 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 115 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 270 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 13.7 seconds | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.3 | 5.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Mazda 5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Alhambra. On average, Mazda 5 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mazda 5 is smaller. Mazda 5 is 27 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1597 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Alhambra has more luggage space. Mazda 5 has 155 litres less trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`115 | ~ 2`343 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |