Mazda 5 2010 vs Mazda 5 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 110 - 146 HP | |
Torque: | 165 - 270 NM | 165 - 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 13.7 seconds | 10.2 - 13.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.3 | 6.1 - 8.3 | |
Mazda 5 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 5 2008. On average, Mazda 5 2010 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5 2008. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 5 2008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.67 m | |
Mazda 5 2010 is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 5 2008, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 5 2010 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 115 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1597 litres | 1678 litres | |
Mazda 5 2010 has 3 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 5 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 5 2008 (by 81 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`115 | ~ 2`176 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 5200 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |