Mazda 5 2010 vs Kia Carens 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 115 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 270 NM | 164 - 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 13.7 seconds | 9.7 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.3 | 4.7 - 7.9 | |
|
Mazda 5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Carens. On average, Mazda 5 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carens. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mazda 5 is 6 cm longer than the Kia Carens, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 492 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1597 litres | 1650 litres | |
|
Kia Carens has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 5 has 380 litres less trunk space than the Kia Carens. This could mean that the Mazda 5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Carens (by 53 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Kia Carens. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`115 | ~ 2`202 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Kia Carens has
| |