Mazda 323 1994 vs Mazda MX-3 1994
| Body: | Hatchback | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 132 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda MX-3 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 323 engine produces 16 HP less power than Mazda MX-3, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.5 | |
|
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 323 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.31 m | |
| Mazda 323 is 19 cm shorter than the Mazda MX-3, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 323 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 289 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 323 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-3. The Mazda MX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Mazda MX-3 has
| |