Mazda 323 1994 vs Mazda 121 1996

 
Mazda 323
1994 - 1997
Mazda 121
1996 - 2002
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP60 HP
Torque: 160 NM103 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds15.9 seconds
Mazda 323 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 323 engine produces 56 HP more power than Mazda 121, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Mazda 121. Thanks to more power Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.47.0
The Mazda 121 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 323 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 121, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 210 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.03 m3.83 m
Width: 1.70 m1.63 m
Height: 1.40 m1.32 m
Mazda 323 is larger.
Mazda 323 is 20 cm longer than the Mazda 121, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres250 litres
Mazda 323 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 323 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 121.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 121.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`460
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Mazda 323 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 121 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1000600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Mazda 121 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv