Mazda 323 1994 vs Kia Sephia 1996

 
Mazda 323
1994 - 1997
Kia Sephia
1996 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP80 HP
Torque: 160 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds11.2 seconds
Mazda 323 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 323 engine produces 36 HP more power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Kia Sephia. Thanks to more power Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.07.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.9 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Kia Sephia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 323 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 323 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
610 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption
Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.03 m4.25 m
Width: 1.70 m1.69 m
Height: 1.40 m1.39 m
Mazda 323 is 22 cm shorter than the Kia Sephia, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 300 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Sephia.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6251`350
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

low
Mazda 323 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sephia has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Kia Sephia has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv