Mazda 323 1994 vs Kia Sephia 1996

 
Mazda 323
1994 - 1997
Kia Sephia
1996 - 1998
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP80 HP
Torque: 134 NM120 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.2 secondsn/a seconds
Mazda 323 engine produces 10 HP more power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Kia Sephia.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.68.4
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 323 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.03 m4.25 m
Width: 1.70 m1.69 m
Height: 1.40 m1.39 m
Mazda 323 is 22 cm shorter than the Kia Sephia, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 300 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Sephia.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`350
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

low
Mazda 323 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sephia has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv