Mazda 323 1994 vs Kia Sephia 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda 323 engine produces 10 HP more power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Kia Sephia. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.4 | |
|
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 323 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
| Mazda 323 is 22 cm shorter than the Kia Sephia, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Sephia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sephia has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
| |