Mazda 323 1994 vs Ford Escort 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 134 NM | 134 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
Mazda 323 and Ford Escort have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 323 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 323 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
710 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.03 m | 4.14 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.35 m | |
Mazda 323 is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Escort, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Escort. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`575 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | low | |
Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Escort has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Ford Escort has
| |