Mazda 323 1994 vs Rover 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 323 engine produces 13 HP less power than Rover 200, but torque is 7 NM more than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 323 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda 323 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 323 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 323 is 6 cm longer than the Rover 200, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1086 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`575 kg | 1`480 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`065 kg | 1`075 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 405 kg | |
| Mazda 323 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Rover 200. Therefore, Mazda 323 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Rover 200 has
| |