Mazda 323 1994 vs Rover 200 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 103 HP | |
Torque: | 107 NM | 127 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 323 engine produces 28 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
By specification Mazda 323 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 323 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.03 m | 3.97 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 323 is 6 cm longer than the Rover 200, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 304 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1086 litres | |
Mazda 323 has 4 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`505 | 1`480 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Rover 200 has
| |