Mazda 323 1994 vs Rover 200 1996

 
Mazda 323
1994 - 1997
Rover 200
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP103 HP
Torque: 107 NM127 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.3 seconds10.7 seconds
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 323 engine produces 28 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.37.1
Real fuel consumption: 7.9 l/100km8.1 l/100km
By specification Mazda 323 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 30 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 323 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
900 km on highway920 km on highway
630 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.03 m3.97 m
Width: 1.70 m1.69 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 323 is 6 cm longer than the Rover 200, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres304 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1086 litres
Mazda 323 has 4 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5051`480
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 1000no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • better manoeuvrability
Rover 200 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv