Mazda 323 1989 vs VAZ 2109 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Mazda 323 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 323 engine produces 22 HP more power than VAZ 2109, whereas torque is 35 NM more than VAZ 2109. Thanks to more power Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.8 | |
|
The VAZ 2109 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 323 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the VAZ 2109, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda 323 is larger, but lower. Mazda 323 is 25 cm longer than the VAZ 2109, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 330 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 5.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 4.6 metres more than that of the VAZ 2109, which means Mazda 323 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`370 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
VAZ 2109 has
| |