Mazda 323 1989 vs Rover 200 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 323 engine produces 22 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.6 | |
|
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 323 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.40 m | |
| Mazda 323 is 4 cm longer than the Rover 200, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 323 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 352 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Rover 200 has
| |