Mazda 323 1989 vs Fiat Croma 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 323 engine produces 72 HP less power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Fiat Croma. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 10.0 | |
|
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 323 consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 323 is smaller. Mazda 323 is 26 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 323 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |