Mazda 323 1994 vs Rover 200 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Mazda 323 engine produces 4 HP more power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Rover 200. Despite the higher power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.6 | |
|
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 323 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda 323 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 323 is 2 cm longer than the Rover 200, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 352 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 323 has 52 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. This could mean that the Mazda 323 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Rover 200 has
| |