Mazda 323 1994 vs Seat Toledo 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 134 NM | 125 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
Mazda 323 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 323 engine produces 15 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 323 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 323 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
710 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.24 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.42 m | |
Mazda 323 is 8 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`575 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | low | |
Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
| |