Mazda 323 1994 vs Opel Vectra 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 323 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 323 engine produces 15 HP more power than Opel Vectra, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Opel Vectra. Thanks to more power Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 323 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Vectra, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 323 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Vectra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Vectra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Opel Astra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Vectra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Opel Vectra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 323 is smaller. Mazda 323 is 24 cm shorter than the Opel Vectra, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 323 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 790 litres | |
|
Opel Vectra has more luggage space. Mazda 323 has 180 litres less trunk space than the Opel Vectra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Vectra, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`575 | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Vectra has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.6/10 | 6.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Opel Vectra has
| |