Mazda 323 1994 vs Ford Escort 1995

 
Mazda 323
1994 - 1997
Ford Escort
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP90 HP
Torque: 134 NM134 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds12.3 seconds
Mazda 323 and Ford Escort have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.28.0
Real fuel consumption: 7.7 l/100km8.0 l/100km
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 323 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 323 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway850 km on highway
710 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.14 m
Width: 1.70 m1.68 m
Height: 1.36 m1.35 m
Mazda 323 is larger.
Mazda 323 is 10 cm longer than the Ford Escort, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 300 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Escort.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5751`200
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

low
Mazda 323 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Escort has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800800
Rating in user reviews: 8.6/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv