Mazda 323 1998 vs Opel Astra 2004

 
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Opel Astra
2004 - 2007
Body: HatchbackEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 72 HP120 HP
Torque: 128 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.9 seconds10.8 seconds
Opel Astra is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 323 engine produces 48 HP less power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 152 NM less than Opel Astra. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.56.1
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 323 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway1000 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.52 m
Width: 1.70 m1.75 m
Height: 1.42 m1.50 m
Mazda 323 is smaller.
Mazda 323 is 32 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 323 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 355 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1000 litres1590 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`695no data
Safety: no data
Quality:Opel Astra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 323 has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 6001200
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Opel Astra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv