Mazda 323 1998 vs Honda Civic 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 72 HP | 160 HP | |
Torque: | 128 NM | 153 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.9 seconds | 8 seconds | |
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 323 engine produces 88 HP less power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 8.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 8.4 | |
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 323 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.20 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
Mazda 323 is 1 cm longer than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 323 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1000 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Mazda 323 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`695 | 1`560 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Mazda 323 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda Civic, so Mazda 323 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 9.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |