Mazda 323 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001

 
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 88 HP75 HP
Torque: 132 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds12.9 seconds
Mazda 323 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 323 engine produces 13 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.56.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.7 l/100km7.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 323 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 165 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 323 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway860 km on highway
710 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km370'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 323 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years4 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda DemioInstalled on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Fabia, Audi A2
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m3.90 m
Width: 1.70 m1.65 m
Height: 1.42 m1.46 m
Mazda 323 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 323 is 30 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 355 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1000 litres975 litres
Mazda 323 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 323 has 110 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 323 (by 25 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6251`490
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 323, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 6001200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv