Mazda 323 1994 vs Rover 200 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 122 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Mazda 323 engine produces 19 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Rover 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.1 | |
| Mazda 323 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
| Mazda 323 is 19 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 352 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage space. Mazda 323 has 52 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`505 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 200 has
| |