Mazda 323 1989 vs Toyota Celica 1990
| Body: | Hatchback | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 67 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 99 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 323 engine produces 38 HP less power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 323 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 323 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mazda 323 is smaller, but higher. Mazda 323 is 43 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 323 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 309 litres | 320 litres | |
| Mazda 323 has 11 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`410 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |