Mazda 323 1989 vs Rover 200 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 122 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Mazda 323 engine produces 19 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Rover 200. Despite less power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.1 | |
| Mazda 323 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda 323 is smaller. Mazda 323 is 23 cm shorter than the Rover 200, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 323 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 309 litres | 352 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage space. Mazda 323 has 43 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`440 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 200 has
| |