Mazda 323 1989 vs Toyota Avensis 2000
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 101 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Avensis is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 323 engine produces 37 HP less power than Toyota Avensis, whereas torque is 49 NM less than Toyota Avensis. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.1 | |
|
The Toyota Avensis is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 323 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 323 is smaller. Mazda 323 is 53 cm shorter than the Toyota Avensis, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 323 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 309 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`490 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota Avensis has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 323 has serious deffects in 460 percent more cases than Toyota Avensis, so Toyota Avensis quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Toyota Avensis has
| |