Mazda 323 1989 vs Rover 200 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 101 NM | 122 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 323 engine produces 19 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.1 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 323 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda 323 is smaller. Mazda 323 is 23 cm shorter than the Rover 200, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 323 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 309 litres | 352 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage space. Mazda 323 has 43 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`490 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 200 has
| |