Mazda 323 1989 vs Toyota Celica 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 56 - 106 HP | 105 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 99 - 151 NM | 142 - 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 16.5 seconds | 6.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.2 | 7.0 - 9.2 | |
|
Mazda 323 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mazda 323 is smaller, but higher. Mazda 323 is 31 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 323 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 309 litres | 320 litres | |
| Mazda 323 has 11 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`519 | ~ 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |