Mazda 323 1989 vs Rover 200 1990

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 323
1989 - 1995
Rover 200
1990 - 1996
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Mazda 323 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Rover 200 can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.3 - 1.81.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 56 - 106 HP75 - 200 HP
Torque: 99 - 151 NM117 - 237 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 - 16.5 seconds6.5 - 12.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.9 - 9.25.9 - 8.9
On average, the Mazda 323 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Rover 200. On average, a Mazda 323 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Rover 200.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.11 m4.22 m
Width: 1.68 m1.68 m
Height: 1.36 m1.40 m
Mazda 323 is smaller.
Mazda 323 is 11 cm shorter than the Rover 200, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 323 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 309 litres352 litres
Rover 200 has more luggage space.
Mazda 323 has 43 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Rover 200.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`519~ 1`569
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 800no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
Rover 200 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv