Mazda 323 1989 vs Rover 200 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Mazda 323 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Rover 200 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.3 - 1.8 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 56 - 106 HP | 75 - 200 HP | |
Torque: | 99 - 151 NM | 117 - 237 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 16.5 seconds | 6.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.2 | 5.9 - 8.9 | |
On average, the Mazda 323 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Rover 200. On average, a Mazda 323 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Rover 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.11 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.40 m | |
Mazda 323 is smaller. Mazda 323 is 11 cm shorter than the Rover 200, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 323 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 309 litres | 352 litres | |
Rover 200 has more luggage space. Mazda 323 has 43 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Rover 200. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`519 | ~ 1`569 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Rover 200 has
| |