Mazda 323 1994 vs Opel Astra 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 323
1994 - 1998
Opel Astra
1998 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol)1.2 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 73 - 147 HP65 - 147 HP
Torque: 108 - 183 NM110 - 280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 - 12.5 seconds8.8 - 17 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.2 - 9.64.6 - 9.3
Mazda 323 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Astra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.21 m4.11 m
Width: 1.70 m1.71 m
Height: 1.37 m1.42 m
Mazda 323 is 10 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 323 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1180 litres
Opel Astra has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 323 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. This could mean that the Mazda 323 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Astra.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`513~ 1`661
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 8001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.6/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • only petrol engines available
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Opel Astra has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv