Mazda 323 1994 vs Mazda Xedos 6 1992

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 323
1994 - 1998
Mazda Xedos 6
1992 - 1999
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 2.01.6 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 73 - 147 HP107 - 147 HP
Torque: 108 - 183 NM138 - 175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 - 12.5 seconds9.3 - 13.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.2 - 9.67.5 - 9.3
Mazda 323 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Xedos 6.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.21 m4.56 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.37 m1.35 m
Mazda 323 is 35 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 323 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres390 litres
Mazda Xedos 6 has more luggage space.
Mazda 323 has 90 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 6.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda Xedos 6.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`513~ 1`685
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 8001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.6/10 6.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Mazda Xedos 6 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv