Mazda 323 1994 vs Rover 200 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 - 147 HP | 75 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 183 NM | 117 - 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 12.5 seconds | 6.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 9.6 | 5.9 - 8.9 | |
|
Mazda 323 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 323 is 1 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 352 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage space. Mazda 323 has 52 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Rover 200, which means Mazda 323 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`513 | ~ 1`569 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Rover 200 has
| |