Mazda 323 1998 vs Opel Astra 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Opel Astra
2004 - 2007
Body: HatchbackEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 2.01.3 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 72 - 114 HP80 - 200 HP
Torque: 108 - 220 NM125 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 - 16.9 seconds8.4 - 15.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.1 - 9.04.8 - 9.7
Mazda 323 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Astra. On average, Mazda 323 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.52 m
Width: 1.70 m1.75 m
Height: 1.42 m1.50 m
Mazda 323 is smaller.
Mazda 323 is 32 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 323 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 355 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1000 litres1590 litres
Opel Astra has more luggage space.
Mazda 323 has 185 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 590 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`649~ 1`893
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 6001200
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Opel Astra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv