Mazda 323 1998 vs Honda Accord 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Honda Accord
2005 - 2007
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 2.02.0 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 72 - 114 HP140 - 190 HP
Torque: 108 - 220 NM190 - 340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 - 16.9 seconds7.9 - 9.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.1 - 9.05.4 - 9.4
Mazda 323 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Mazda 323 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.66 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
Mazda 323 is smaller.
Mazda 323 is 46 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 323 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 355 litres459 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1000 litresno data
Honda Accord has more luggage space.
Mazda 323 has 104 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`649~ 1`920
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 6002000
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 9.1/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Honda Accord has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv