Mazda 3 2013 vs Mazda 3 2009

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 165 HP150 HP
Torque: 210 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds10.6 seconds
Mazda 3 2013 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 2013 engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda 3 2009, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Mazda 3 2009. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.27.9
The Mazda 3 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 2013 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2009, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway850 km on highway
Mazda 3 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 12 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mazda 3 2013 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.49 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Mazda 3 2013 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 3 2013 is 10 cm longer than the Mazda 3 2009, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 2013 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres430 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 2013 has 11 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3 2009. This could mean that the Mazda 3 2013 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2013 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3 2009.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8151`770
Safety:
Mazda 3 2013 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda 3 2013 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:Mazda 3 2013 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 2009 has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Mazda 3 2013, so Mazda 3 2013 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 6003600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Mazda 3 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv