Mazda 3 2013 vs Honda Civic 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda 3 engine produces 7 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Honda Civic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.6 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 5 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 428 litres | |
| Mazda 3 has 9 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 1`245 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Honda Civic scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mazda 3 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda Civic, so Mazda 3 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |